Music, First or Second Language Acquisition and Pronunciation
Edwin Suryadi F.I
According to some language
researchers (Fiske, 1993; Heller & Campbell, 1981; Sloboda, 1985; Swain,
1986), there seems to be some sort of symbiotic relationship between the
underlying principles and the mental processing of language and music at the
meta level. It has been asserted that infants learn their native language by
principles that make sense of aural information; therefore, it seems reasonable
to approach second language acquisition in a similar way (Jackendoff, 1994). Since
music is also acquired through the aural sense, musical activities are
suggested to aid in first or second language acquisition.
Some studies which were reviewed by
Marquart (1992) have concluded that remarkable differences exist between
children who are sung to daily, versus those who are not, especially in the
area of speech and language acquisition. Marquart explains the background of
these studies:
Most of these studies are based on
the philosophy of Kodàly, the Hungarian musicologist, composer, researcher and
philosopher, who believed that music played a significant role in the development
of mankind. He also believed that it was important to begin music education at
the youngest possible age. His philosophy was that music’s place in the
curriculum was one of a core subject. His research indicated that classes
receiving daily music instruction academically surpassed classes receiving less
frequent instruction. Noted improvement in other academic areas, particularly
math, was an unexpected result in Kodàly’s first experiment. The results of his
studies convinced the Hungarian Ministry of Education to expand the Singing
Primary Schools.
Lowe (1995) investigated whether the
incorporation of a music program would reinforce both the learning of music, as
well as the learning of a second language. The subjects of her study were 53 second-grade
students of the French Immersion program in Canada that were set up in
interdisciplinary music and French classes. Students were given eight weekly
units of five 15- minute music lessons that were incorporated into the regular
French secondlanguage classes. Daily lesson plans for both classes were
prepared together by both teachers using the same educational materials and
curriculum content. The results showed that the group that received the
additional music lessons performed significantly better than the control group
in all music tests and in the oral grammar and reading comprehension French
tests, even though the principal emphasis was on musical instruction. Her
findings lead to the conclusion that the study of music and foreign languages
are mutually beneficial.
According to Murphey, 1987, music has
been used more extensively in the ESL classroom since teachers have more access
to songs in English. In Switzerland, adolescents ar in contact with between
8-12 hours a week of english language music, double or triple the number of
hours of English classes in school. Such contact may just be making learning
English in school easier if, as Lyczak (1979) concluded, prior exposure to
language does affect subsequent learning, even when this exposure is not
linguistically meaningful. For an extensive list of commercial ESL materials
using music, see Lems (1996).
The purpose of Cormier’s (1985) study
was to determine the extent of the relationship between selected music and
French second language variables. Subjects encompassed 79 students in grades 4,
5, and 6, who were enrolled in French Immersion (including music) classes.
Students were tested for six days with standardized tests for music and
reading, with French tests created by the researcher. The French variables
included: retention of aural information, comprehension, vocabulary, diction,
pronunciation, language reading and imitation. The music variables included:
tonal imagery, rhythm imagery, phrasing, music reading and pitch
discrimination. Results of this study found the music variables to be
significant predictors of the speech variables, implying that music and speech,
both aural expressions, may involve similar learning processes. The final
conclusion was that a relationship exists between French second language and
music variables for grades four, five and six subjects when mental ability is taken
into consideration. This is supported by the theories of Bruner (1960), Gagné
(1977), and Thorndike (1913) who suggested that learning transfer occurs
through similar elements, shared between subject areas.
Medina (1990) conducted a qualitative
research on the effectiveness of music and story illustrations in the English
vocabulary acquisition of second-grade limited English proficient students. The
dependent variable of vocabulary acquisition was crossed with instructional
medium (Music/No Music) and extralinguistic support (Illustrations/No
Illustrations). After a four day treatment, mean vocabulary gain scores were
consistently higher for music treatment groups and illustration groups. The
gain scores for vocabulary acquisition were highest for the group that used
both music and illustrations. Data obtained one and a half weeks after treatment
showed mean gain scores were still consistently higher for the combined effects
of both music and illustrations. The investigation provided empirical support
that music is a useful tool for second language acquisition.
Most adults who learn a foreign
language speak with an accent which derives in part from phonological and
phonetic differences between their native language (L1) and the target foreign
language (L2). Music can be effective in improving phonetic skills in a variety
of ways. Leith (1979) stated, “There is probably not a better nor quicker way
to teach phonetics than with songs” (p. 540). Gatti-Taylor (1980) believed that
phonetic instruction was one good use to which songs could be put, even in
beginning classes, stating, “It is relatively easy to find song lyrics that
stress a particular phoneme” (p. 466). García-Sáez (1984) agreed stating, “the
use of song is an excellent way to practice Spanish phonetics and it is not at
all difficult to find examples of songs that contain sounds the majority of
students have trouble producing” (p. 4). The melody, combined with the lyrics,
provides an excellent opportunity to review pronunciation and enjoy music at the
same time.
Traditional pronunciation texts have
emphasized or implied that students should strive for perfect pronunciation or
near-native pronunciation. Morely (1996) contended that this would be an
unrealistic goal, an important shift in language instruction now tends to
emphasize a communicative focus: “one that views the proper place of
pronunciation in the L2 curriculum as an integral part of communication, not a
separate drill-based component set aside from the mainstream of spoken
discourse” (p. 151).
Techmeier (1969) concluded that the
most difficult skill in learning a foreign language is proper pronunciation. He
felt that if the child does not pronounce a word well, the problem may be that
the child does not hear the word correctly. According to Techmeier, as well as
Urbanic and Vizmuller (1981), singing helped to develop better hearing skills
and, as a result, promoted and reinforced good articulation of words.
Poliquin (1988) reported that the
particular value and effectiveness of using songs in language instruction, was
specifically to improve pronunciation skills. He explained that semantic
comprehension is controlled by the left brain and that musical tones and rhythm
are controlled by the right. He therefore encouraged the pedagogical use of
songs to develop cognitive skills, to demonstrate the relationship of language
rhythm and song rhythm, and to teach a second or third language.
Karimer (1994) formulated a study
using ESL students to find out if acquiring a native-like fluency would be
faster using nursery rhymes, chants and songs. Students were Southeastern Asian
adults, who were divided into ethnic groups. This division was made since the
Lao Hmong group’s culture practiced a courtship ritual requiring the man to
look for two qualities in a wife, sewing and singing. The man sang an original
love song to his intended, who then responded by matching his intonation
patterns exactly. No difference was noted with this nationality since only
three subjects from this group remained in the final results.
The subjects’ task was to distinguish
between minimal pairs defined as two words that differ in one phoneme only-for
example “fill/pill, buzz/bus.” Both groups were given a pre-test that
distinguished between phoneme sounds, then they were given a treatment
consisting of 20 minutes of instruction, twice a week, and over a two week
period. The control group was asked to listen to a word list of 10 minimal
pairs, while the experimental group was asked to listen to various songs and
rhythmic chants which presented the same sounds contextually. The students were
given a post-test similar to the pre-test after the two week period. An
advantage in test scores was seen in the experimental group. Since the control
group had tested higher on the pre-test, the improvement scores were used to
compare between the groups. The improvement score for the control group was 3.9
while the experimental, songs and chant group gained 10 points. These results
indicated a definite advantage for the experimental group, after only two weeks
of treatment. In addition to the rhythm of the language, what might have been a
important factor in this case was contextual learning, or learning the use of a
language as it naturally occurs.
In a study of Spanish pronunciation
and musical aptitude, Eterno (1961) found a direct relationship between musical
aptitude and/or musical training and foreign language pronunciation. This might
suggest that although teachers present the material to a group of students,
those who (perhaps unknowingly) have a musical aptitude may be more affected by
language when that language is presented in song form.
Arellano and Draper (1975) considered
79 students in fifth grade, who had experienced previous exposure to Spanish.
Subjects were tested on 15 variables. Researchers viewed the relationship
between discriminatory abilitiespitch, intensity, rhythm, timbre, and tonal
memory-and the capacity to achieve in the area of Spanish accent and Spanish
language comprehension. Overall results indicated musical ability and Spanish
accent were strongly correlated, even when the possible common relationship
with I. Q. was taken into consideration. Researchers concluded that the close
relationship found to exist between musical ability and second language
learning may suggest that the learning of music and second language can be
mutually reinforcing.
Scovel (1969) discussed the
relationship between cerebral dominance and a speaker’s accent. He states that
the onset of cerebral dominance, which seems to occur around the age of twelve,
inhibits the ability of a person to master the sound patterns of a second
language without an impinging foreign accent. He believes that adults cannot
master the sound patterns of a second language with the fluency of a native
speaker. The basis for this opinion is the fact that children learn language in
a different way-with actual objects in the environment and their names, the
largest being visual-auditory and tactile-auditory association. When adults
learn a second language, it is primarily done by translating from the first
language, i.e., by auditory-auditory associations, not by dealing directly with
the environment. Different anatomical regions are used in the two cases.
Speakers in Scovel’s study (1969)
were asked to say a simple sentence twice. The listeners, junior high school
students, were able to judge whether the speakers were native born Americans
with an 85% accuracy. His point is that speakers must achieve a native accent
before the age of twelve or they will never be able to sound native. He presents
the possibility that it is the nature of the brain, specifically the phenomenon
called cerebral dominance or lateralization, that accounts for the ability of
children to learn languages fluently. He states that there is strong
circumstantial evidence that the maturational development of cerebral dominance
is closely linked to the ability to acquire language. He believes it is nature,
not nurture, which determines our ability to speak without a foreign accent.
What he pointed out as the different
ways that children learn a language, and different anatomical regions used in
learning, may well be attributed to nurture in the way that adults are taught.
The traditional method has been to teach adults using the first language as the
foundation. Perhaps we could teach adults with actual objects in the
environment, as well as allow them the same listening period (Kadota, 1987;
Postovsky, 1974) or silent period (Krashen, 1985) that is present under natural
acquisition circumstances where they hear the native sounds until they are
ready to produce speech.
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar